http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhWgZu6tcZU&feature=related
And here some approved UN abuses!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMEw0lZ3k_Y&feature=related
And here is a Sderot resident appealing to UN re imbalance in human rights...."all men are created equal but some more than others"....Some people are deseving of human rights but not others....."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QYifo19scI&feature=related
Sunday, 26 April 2009
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
This is hilarious
http://dotsub.com/view/84f5c72d-b0ba-408c-ace3-8cc40995e011 English guy about the demands from Islam
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
Mumbai
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=rHeB81BbuYU
http://www.steynonline.com/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,33/
WHO'S VULNERABLE?
Steyn on the World > Saturday, 13 December 2008
Shortly after the London Tube bombings in 2005, a reader of Tim Blair, the> Sydney Daily Telegraph's columnar wag, sent him a note-perfect parody of a> typical newspaper headline: "British Muslims Fear Repercussions Over> Tomorrow's Train Bombing."> > Indeed. And so it goes. This time round - Bombay - it was the Associated> Press that filed a story about how Muslims "found themselves on the> defensive once again about bloodshed linked to their religion."> > Oh, I don't know about that. In fact, you'd be hard pressed from most news> reports to figure out the bloodshed was "linked" to any religion, least of> all one beginning with "I-" and ending in "-slam." In the three years since> those British bombings, the media have more or less entirely abandoned the> offending formulations - "Islamic terrorists," "Muslim extremists" - and by> the time of the assault on Bombay found it easier just to call the alleged> perpetrators "militants" or "gunmen" or "teenage gunmen," as in the opening> line of this report in the Australian: "An Adelaide woman in India for her> wedding is lucky to be alive after teenage gunmen ran amok." > > Kids today, eh? Always running amok in an aimless fashion.> > The veteran British TV anchor Jon Snow, on the other hand, opted for the> more cryptic locution "practitioners." "Practitioners" of what, exactly?> > Hard to say. And getting harder. Tom Gross produced a jaw-dropping round-up> of Bombay media coverage: The discovery that, for the first time in an> Indian terrorist atrocity, Jews had been attacked, tortured, and killed> produced from the New York Times a serene befuddlement: "It is not known if> the Jewish center was strategically chosen, or if it was an accidental> hostage scene."> > Hmm. Greater Bombay forms one of the world's five biggest cities. It has a> population of nearly 20 million. But only one Jewish center, located in a> building that gives no external clue as to the bounty waiting therein. An> "accidental hostage scene" that one of the "practitioners" just happened to> stumble upon? "I must be the luckiest jihadist in town. What are the odds?"> > Meanwhile, the New Age guru Deepak Chopra laid all the blame on American> foreign policy for "going after the wrong people" and inflaming moderates,> and "that inflammation then gets organized and appears as this disaster in> Bombay."> > Really? The inflammation just "appears"? Like a bad pimple? The "fairer" we> get to the, ah, inflamed militant practitioners, the unfairer we get to> everyone else. At the Chabad House, the murdered Jews were described in> almost all the Western media as "ultra-Orthodox," "ultra-" in this instance> being less a term of theological precision than a generalized code for> "strange, weird people, nothing against them personally, but they probably> shouldn't have been over there in the first place." Are they stranger or> weirder than their killers? Two "inflamed moderates" entered the Chabad> House, shouted "Allahu Akbar!," tortured the Jews and murdered them,> including the young Rabbi's pregnant wife. Their two-year-old child escaped> because of a quick-witted (non-Jewish) nanny who hid in a closet and then,> risking being mown down by machine-gun fire, ran with him to safety.> > The Times was being silly in suggesting this was just an "accidental"> hostage opportunity - and not just because, when Muslim terrorists capture> Jews, it's not a hostage situation, it's a mass murder-in-waiting. The sole> surviving "militant" revealed that the Jewish center had been targeted a> year in advance. The 28-year-old rabbi was Gavriel Holtzberg. His pregnant> wife was Rivka Holtzberg. Their orphaned son is Moshe Holtzberg, and his> brave nanny is Sandra Samuels. Remember their names, not because they're any> more important than the Indians, Britons, and Americans targeted in the> attack on Bombay, but because they are an especially revealing glimpse into> the pathologies of the perpetrators.> > In a well-planned attack on iconic Bombay landmarks symbolizing great power> and wealth, the "militants" nevertheless found time to divert 20 percent of> their manpower to torturing and killing a handful of obscure Jews helping> the city's poor in a nondescript building. If they were just "teenage> gunmen" or "militants" in the cause of Kashmir, engaged in a more or less> conventional territorial dispute with India, why kill the only rabbi in> Bombay? Dennis Prager got to the absurdity of it when he invited his readers> to imagine Basque separatists attacking Madrid: "Would the terrorists take> time out to murder all those in the Madrid Chabad House? The idea is> ludicrous."> > And yet we take it for granted that Pakistani "militants" in a long-running> border dispute with India would take time out of their hectic schedule to> kill Jews. In going to ever more baroque lengths to avoid saying "Islamic"> or "Muslim" or "terrorist," we have somehow managed to internalize the> pathologies of these men.> > We are enjoined to be "understanding," and we're doing our best. A> Minnesotan suicide bomber (now there's a phrase) originally from Somalia> returned to the old country and blew up himself and 29 other people last> October. His family prevailed upon your government to have his parts (or as> many of them as could be sifted from the debris) returned to the United> States at taxpayer expense and buried in Burnsville Cemetery. Well, hey, in> the current climate, what's the big deal about a federal bailout of jihad> operational expenses? If that's not "too big to fail," what is?> > Last week, a Canadian critic reprimanded me for failing to understand that> Muslims feel "vulnerable." Au contraire, they project tremendous cultural> confidence, as well they might: They're the world's fastest-growing> population. A prominent British Muslim announced the other day that, when> the United Kingdom becomes a Muslim state, non-Muslims will be required to> wear insignia identifying them as infidels. If he's feeling "vulnerable,"> he's doing a terrific job of covering it up.> > We are told that the "vast majority" of the 1.6-1.8 billion Muslims (in> Deepak Chopra's estimate) are "moderate." Maybe so, but they're also quiet.> And, as the AIDs activists used to say, "Silence=Acceptance." It equals> acceptance of the things done in the name of their faith. Rabbi Holtzberg> was not murdered because of a territorial dispute over Kashmir or because of> Bush's foreign policy. He was murdered in the name of Islam - "Allahu> Akbar."> > I wrote in my book, America Alone, that "reforming" Islam is something only> Muslims can do. But they show very little sign of being interested in doing> it, and the rest of us are inclined to accept that. Spread a rumor that a> Koran got flushed down the can at Gitmo, and there'll be rioting throughout> the Muslim world. Publish some dull cartoons in a minor Danish newspaper,> and there'll be protests around the planet. But slaughter the young pregnant> wife of a rabbi in Bombay in the name of Allah, and that's just business as> usual. And, if it is somehow "understandable" that for the first time in> history it's no longer safe for a Jew to live in India, then we are greasing> the skids for a very slippery slope. Muslims, the AP headline informs us,> "worry about image." Not enough. > The Orange County Register, December 2008
http://www.steynonline.com/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,33/
WHO'S VULNERABLE?
Steyn on the World > Saturday, 13 December 2008
Shortly after the London Tube bombings in 2005, a reader of Tim Blair, the> Sydney Daily Telegraph's columnar wag, sent him a note-perfect parody of a> typical newspaper headline: "British Muslims Fear Repercussions Over> Tomorrow's Train Bombing."> > Indeed. And so it goes. This time round - Bombay - it was the Associated> Press that filed a story about how Muslims "found themselves on the> defensive once again about bloodshed linked to their religion."> > Oh, I don't know about that. In fact, you'd be hard pressed from most news> reports to figure out the bloodshed was "linked" to any religion, least of> all one beginning with "I-" and ending in "-slam." In the three years since> those British bombings, the media have more or less entirely abandoned the> offending formulations - "Islamic terrorists," "Muslim extremists" - and by> the time of the assault on Bombay found it easier just to call the alleged> perpetrators "militants" or "gunmen" or "teenage gunmen," as in the opening> line of this report in the Australian: "An Adelaide woman in India for her> wedding is lucky to be alive after teenage gunmen ran amok." > > Kids today, eh? Always running amok in an aimless fashion.> > The veteran British TV anchor Jon Snow, on the other hand, opted for the> more cryptic locution "practitioners." "Practitioners" of what, exactly?> > Hard to say. And getting harder. Tom Gross produced a jaw-dropping round-up> of Bombay media coverage: The discovery that, for the first time in an> Indian terrorist atrocity, Jews had been attacked, tortured, and killed> produced from the New York Times a serene befuddlement: "It is not known if> the Jewish center was strategically chosen, or if it was an accidental> hostage scene."> > Hmm. Greater Bombay forms one of the world's five biggest cities. It has a> population of nearly 20 million. But only one Jewish center, located in a> building that gives no external clue as to the bounty waiting therein. An> "accidental hostage scene" that one of the "practitioners" just happened to> stumble upon? "I must be the luckiest jihadist in town. What are the odds?"> > Meanwhile, the New Age guru Deepak Chopra laid all the blame on American> foreign policy for "going after the wrong people" and inflaming moderates,> and "that inflammation then gets organized and appears as this disaster in> Bombay."> > Really? The inflammation just "appears"? Like a bad pimple? The "fairer" we> get to the, ah, inflamed militant practitioners, the unfairer we get to> everyone else. At the Chabad House, the murdered Jews were described in> almost all the Western media as "ultra-Orthodox," "ultra-" in this instance> being less a term of theological precision than a generalized code for> "strange, weird people, nothing against them personally, but they probably> shouldn't have been over there in the first place." Are they stranger or> weirder than their killers? Two "inflamed moderates" entered the Chabad> House, shouted "Allahu Akbar!," tortured the Jews and murdered them,> including the young Rabbi's pregnant wife. Their two-year-old child escaped> because of a quick-witted (non-Jewish) nanny who hid in a closet and then,> risking being mown down by machine-gun fire, ran with him to safety.> > The Times was being silly in suggesting this was just an "accidental"> hostage opportunity - and not just because, when Muslim terrorists capture> Jews, it's not a hostage situation, it's a mass murder-in-waiting. The sole> surviving "militant" revealed that the Jewish center had been targeted a> year in advance. The 28-year-old rabbi was Gavriel Holtzberg. His pregnant> wife was Rivka Holtzberg. Their orphaned son is Moshe Holtzberg, and his> brave nanny is Sandra Samuels. Remember their names, not because they're any> more important than the Indians, Britons, and Americans targeted in the> attack on Bombay, but because they are an especially revealing glimpse into> the pathologies of the perpetrators.> > In a well-planned attack on iconic Bombay landmarks symbolizing great power> and wealth, the "militants" nevertheless found time to divert 20 percent of> their manpower to torturing and killing a handful of obscure Jews helping> the city's poor in a nondescript building. If they were just "teenage> gunmen" or "militants" in the cause of Kashmir, engaged in a more or less> conventional territorial dispute with India, why kill the only rabbi in> Bombay? Dennis Prager got to the absurdity of it when he invited his readers> to imagine Basque separatists attacking Madrid: "Would the terrorists take> time out to murder all those in the Madrid Chabad House? The idea is> ludicrous."> > And yet we take it for granted that Pakistani "militants" in a long-running> border dispute with India would take time out of their hectic schedule to> kill Jews. In going to ever more baroque lengths to avoid saying "Islamic"> or "Muslim" or "terrorist," we have somehow managed to internalize the> pathologies of these men.> > We are enjoined to be "understanding," and we're doing our best. A> Minnesotan suicide bomber (now there's a phrase) originally from Somalia> returned to the old country and blew up himself and 29 other people last> October. His family prevailed upon your government to have his parts (or as> many of them as could be sifted from the debris) returned to the United> States at taxpayer expense and buried in Burnsville Cemetery. Well, hey, in> the current climate, what's the big deal about a federal bailout of jihad> operational expenses? If that's not "too big to fail," what is?> > Last week, a Canadian critic reprimanded me for failing to understand that> Muslims feel "vulnerable." Au contraire, they project tremendous cultural> confidence, as well they might: They're the world's fastest-growing> population. A prominent British Muslim announced the other day that, when> the United Kingdom becomes a Muslim state, non-Muslims will be required to> wear insignia identifying them as infidels. If he's feeling "vulnerable,"> he's doing a terrific job of covering it up.> > We are told that the "vast majority" of the 1.6-1.8 billion Muslims (in> Deepak Chopra's estimate) are "moderate." Maybe so, but they're also quiet.> And, as the AIDs activists used to say, "Silence=Acceptance." It equals> acceptance of the things done in the name of their faith. Rabbi Holtzberg> was not murdered because of a territorial dispute over Kashmir or because of> Bush's foreign policy. He was murdered in the name of Islam - "Allahu> Akbar."> > I wrote in my book, America Alone, that "reforming" Islam is something only> Muslims can do. But they show very little sign of being interested in doing> it, and the rest of us are inclined to accept that. Spread a rumor that a> Koran got flushed down the can at Gitmo, and there'll be rioting throughout> the Muslim world. Publish some dull cartoons in a minor Danish newspaper,> and there'll be protests around the planet. But slaughter the young pregnant> wife of a rabbi in Bombay in the name of Allah, and that's just business as> usual. And, if it is somehow "understandable" that for the first time in> history it's no longer safe for a Jew to live in India, then we are greasing> the skids for a very slippery slope. Muslims, the AP headline informs us,> "worry about image." Not enough. > The Orange County Register, December 2008
Wednesday, 11 February 2009
A Blood-libel at the Royal Court theatre
http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/02/08/seven-jewish-children-a-play-for-gaza-by-caryl-churchill-at-the-royal-court/
This is from Harry's Place blog. It shows the hypocracy of people who turn down an anti-Islamic play but merrily show an offensive, untrue anti-semitic one. I despair for humanity!!
This is from Harry's Place blog. It shows the hypocracy of people who turn down an anti-Islamic play but merrily show an offensive, untrue anti-semitic one. I despair for humanity!!
Monday, 9 February 2009
What we are up against
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amMxHD9Vk04&feature=related
This is old but it shows what we are up against. I assume the title of the film is to get people to watch it!!
This is old but it shows what we are up against. I assume the title of the film is to get people to watch it!!
Thursday, 5 February 2009
'My daughters, they killed them': Doctor shows Israelis horror of war
This was in the Independent-note how they are wrong on the shellings of UN-run schools!! See below to see the truth of what happened-how he was told to get his kids out but he chose not to listen. See what was in his house in the posting below that! This is a man who loves peace?
By Ben Lynfield in Tel Hashomer, Israel
Monday, 19 January 2009
RANAAN/AP
Dr Izz el-Deen Aboul Aish bursts into tears on Friday after his daughters' deaths
© More pictures
Like the shellings of UN-run schools and a major hospital in Gaza City, the Israeli public might have regarded the deaths of his three daughters as just more collateral damage in an ugly but justified war, if they noticed it at all. But Dr Izz el-Deen Aboul Aish is a gynaecologist at Israel's Shiba Hospital near Tel Aviv, and is well known among Israeli medical colleagues and journalists.
During the 22 days of Israel's military onslaught on Gaza, the Palestinian doctor and peace advocate who speaks Hebrew fluently had helped the Israeli media cover the war by giving phone interviews from inside Gaza.
But on Friday night, Dr Aboul Aish's scheduled live interview with Israeli Channel 10 television was conducted minutes after three of his daughters were killed by an Israeli shell. His raw anguish forced Israelis to take their first real glimpse of the suffering and death caused to Palestinian civilians.
By Ben Lynfield in Tel Hashomer, Israel
Monday, 19 January 2009
RANAAN/AP
Dr Izz el-Deen Aboul Aish bursts into tears on Friday after his daughters' deaths
© More pictures
Like the shellings of UN-run schools and a major hospital in Gaza City, the Israeli public might have regarded the deaths of his three daughters as just more collateral damage in an ugly but justified war, if they noticed it at all. But Dr Izz el-Deen Aboul Aish is a gynaecologist at Israel's Shiba Hospital near Tel Aviv, and is well known among Israeli medical colleagues and journalists.
During the 22 days of Israel's military onslaught on Gaza, the Palestinian doctor and peace advocate who speaks Hebrew fluently had helped the Israeli media cover the war by giving phone interviews from inside Gaza.
But on Friday night, Dr Aboul Aish's scheduled live interview with Israeli Channel 10 television was conducted minutes after three of his daughters were killed by an Israeli shell. His raw anguish forced Israelis to take their first real glimpse of the suffering and death caused to Palestinian civilians.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)